Saturday, January 10, 2009

The Tufts Medical Center/Blue Cross Blue Shield Debacle

This past Monday, January 5th, 2009, I heard with interest Tufts Medical Center would no longer accept Blue Cross Blue Shield as medical insurance because negotiations had broken down regarding reimbursement rates. Among the plethora of things I am interested in are medicine, insurance and negotiations so this whole story is right up my alley. I’ve also been employed in positions that have involved some or all of these subjects at one time or another. I am not a stranger to the health care system (though, thankfully, usually not as a patient), insurance, medical coding and billing and negotiations both independently and with health care facilities.

I understand there are always two sides to every story so I was prepared to find Tufts asking for an unreasonable increase in reimbursements but when I looked into it further I was shocked, dismayed and then impressed that Tufts Medical Center has even been able to survive in the health care climate in Massachusetts. The odds have been heavily stacked against them.

In 1993 Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham & Women’s Hospital agreed to join forces for the sake of efficiency. Or so they said at the time but having not actually merged, there was no discernible increase in efficiency. This merger was the birth of Partner’s HealthCare. Over time Partner’s absorbed Faulkner Hospital, McLean Hospital, Newton Wellesley Hospital, North Shore Medical Center, Shaughnessy-Kaplan Rehabilitation Hospital and Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital. They also spawned Rehabilitation Hospital of The Cape and the Islands.

The piece de resistance occurred in 2000 when Dr. Samuel O. Their of Partners and William C. Van Faasen of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts brokered a gentlemen’s agreement to increase both the cost of health care and the reimbursements from insurance. Since 2000 Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts has increased the amount it pays Partners Health Care by 75 percent. Partners also pressured Tufts health insurance and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care to provide similar increases. What started as a merger to increase efficiency and lower costs has grown into a huge capitalist venture between an insurance corporation and a health care ”non-profit” organization.

When arguing against agreeing to Tufts Medical Center’s nine percent reimbursement increase request Blue Cross Blue Shield points out that Tufts is not as formidable as facilities such as Massachusetts General or Brigham & Women’s but the irony is that Blue Cross Blue Shield colluded to make them that way. Blue Cross Blue Shield’s argument is not even much of an argument when you consider Tufts has one of the largest heart transplant centers in the area, gives exceptional service to patients who are, on a whole, sicker than those in other facilities and trains more primary care physicians than any other hospital.

The Boston Globe obtained rate information from Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts showing that Tufts Medical Center is paid 35 percent less than both Brigham & Women’s Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital and 19 percent less than Beth Israel Deaconess. Lest you think this difference is because Tufts is a teaching hospital, all three of those facilities are teaching hospitals for Harvard Medical School.

From all my reading on this matter I have reached one major conclusion: Partners HealthCare and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts started this avalanche that is now our nation’s health care crisis. Hand in hand, Partners has increased the cost of treatment while Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts has caused a raise in premiums from every insurer in order to keep up the pace of paying for it. My conclusion is only an opinion but if you start reading up on this, I think you are likely to draw the same conclusion.

As a nation, we need to work to find a solution to this crisis. We need to find a way to decrease the bureaucracy and paper work for our doctors and nurses so they can do what they do best – save lives. In the interim, until there is a solution, Blue Cross Blue Shield needs to treat Tufts Medical Center by the same standards as they treat other comparable facilities. Blue Cross Blue Shield needs to get back in the business of assuring access to quality health care rather than creating monopolies. You can afford it, Blue Cross Blue Shield. Show Tufts the money.

16 comments:

  1. Saving lives "medically" isn't the only thing we need. We need a system that doesn't reward companies that pump chemicals inthe soil & in the the air that create cancers, a system that doesn't make pill popping & surgeries the cornerstone of "health" care. We need to be responsible for our own health and not rely on the doctor every time we get a sniffle. We need to get financial profit out of the forefront the health care delivery system. Many elderly with multiple diseases are getting tens and thousands of dollars of care (often just before they die) b/c they have insurance while others can't get help. Greed & Irresponsibility at the root-- and we've allowed our government reps to be complicit in it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is outrageous but not surprising. It seems like everyone with access to do so has taken full advantage during this recent era of fiscal permissiveness.

    It's important for people to know about this story (most of us are focused more on the inability to get insured) and it's important that we all make enough noise to our elected representatives to demand they stand up to insurance and for-profit healthcare lobbying.

    I'm interested, now, in finding out more about how these sorts of arrangements are affecting us here in California. Thank you for the concise overview.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Keep in mind that there is no single Blue Cross Blue Shield. For instance, BCBS Texas is a completely separate company from BCBS Michigan. I know this because a friend works for them, and they're not even remotely affiliated. I can't remember how many separate Blue Cross Blue Shields there are, but it's quite a few.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I worked in the VA Healthcare System for years and there was this competition between Tufts and Harvard. For years, Tufts was the teaching affiliate with the VA until 'they' decided that somehow Harvard was somehow superior.It is time that health care cease as a business and refocus on providing quality, affordable, and comprehensive patient care. Let us pray that with the new leadership in Washington, this will be a top priority. Thank you for posting this.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I read your tweets tonight about this and am posting because I believe most people do care, just not sure what they can do to help. Like Matthew said, BCBS operates independently in most states. I live in Nebraska, but have insurance with BCBS in Alabama because that is where my husband's company resides. I had surgery last year at Creighton Medical Center and was shocked at what my bill was and the small amount that BCBS paid. Keep in mind that I only had to pay my deductible. So who pays the rest? Does CUMC write off the difference? When I asked BCBS, I didn't get any type of satisfaction from their reply, so I dropped it. My point is, as an average Jane, I'm not sure what I can do other than be grateful that there seems to be health care reform on the agenda this year. Thanks for making us aware that Twitter can be used for more than "I just ate a burrito."

    ReplyDelete
  6. I love your post about the Tufts Medical Center/BCBS Massachusetts debacle! You are right on.

    Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts has no problem richly compensating its executives ($3.6 million for its president and CEO in 2007); it just doesn't feel the need to fairly compensate Tufts physicians. There is no excuse for this!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Thanks for writing such a comprehensive post. This issue is very frustrating and I'm glad you were able to sort through the mess and make sense of it all. I will pass this post. The changes that could arise from this potential break between Tufts and BCBSMA could be catastrophic for all. A change like this not only affects patients and the hospital, but will have a direct (and negative) effect on the greater Boston economy as a whole. I hope it gets resolved soon.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The business of healthcare is business, even for "nonprofit" entities. Those of us old timers remember when Blue Cross Blue Shield was the health insurance company (Bill Cosby alludes to it in a bit about the birth of his first child). Likewise, MGH had a reputation that has since become a marketing icon, like Coach bags. You have to remember that the 617 area code has more teaching hospitals per square mile than probably anywhere else in the United States. A few years ago, a study was released that showed 48% of inpatient admissions in Massachusetts were to teaching hospitals, whereas they only constituted 19% of admissions for the rest of the country. Healthcare in Massachusetts is a buyer's market, and when you have intense marketing and branding (ie- MGH, Partners) you will pull in the business and use the numbers to justify the "value" of what you're selling. Can you get the same care in a community hospital that you can at a big academic medical center? In many cases, probably so. But in a consumer-driven industry, why go to Joe Patchemup MD at Melrose Wakefield when, for the same copayment, you can tell your friends you saw the world-famous Ludwig von Biggschott MD at MGH? Tufts NEMC has alot of great services (electrophysiology, gamma knife, etc) but until thay can get their logo on some designer jeans of Steven Spielberg makes a film about them, they're going to have to tough out the battle with the big boys.

    ReplyDelete
  9. If people with BCBS want to be treated at Tufts, they should be able to do so. The type of collusion you describe should be illegal and points to the problems inherent in allowing health care to operate as a capitalist system.

    ReplyDelete
  10. BCBS-NC is also a separate entity, but they are using the same model. I imagine many insurance companies are doing the same. It was horrible for us since my mother was going through cancer treatment at the time. In addition to her illness, she had to worry about losing coverage at local participating hospitals. Thanks for the post.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I read your post several times to make sure I was correctly grasping the level of greediness being displayed by BCBS of MA. Sure enough, reading the facts over and over didn't magically make it any less disgusting. My employer offers BCBS as our only insurance option provider so if I want coverage I have no choice but to be a member. I have been a patient of Tufts NEMC for many years as the location of my PCP as well as where I had surgery back in 2004. I received exemplary care before, after, and during this procedure and have been continuing to go to this hospital for regular checkups ever since. I have friends who if this coverage issue is not resolved will have to start from square one in assembling a reliable and knowledgeable team of doctors. This is outrageous and poses so many dangers to many patients like my friends. The healthcare system of the US has always been the laughing stock to such nations like Canada and Europe where healthcare is comprehensive and at very low lost to the patients. If we don't speak out towards the bureaucracy and selfishness of the current issue, things could get even worse for patients that rely on having a stable team of doctors, which should be an option for everyone.

    ReplyDelete
  12. To show support for Tufts, you can join the Facebook group:

    "Tufts Medical Center Campaign for a Fair Contract"

    Thanks again for your great post.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Wow, nice post. I like the level of research you put into it. Of course, it makes me very angry , but I am glad someone is saying it.

    How does something like this happen anyway? How does it get past regulatory oversight? Seems fishy to me. Perhaps I am mistaken, but it doesn't seem like you dug into any ata that was not public info. Why didn't someone else see the pattern?

    I applaud Tufts and hope that they continue to fight and do not blow to the pressure of BCBS. While struggling, I really hope that the facts of the case become widely know. Only once too many people know about a problem that it can't be swept under the rug will true change happen. Keep it up!

    All in all, I think our health care system is a joke. It's rife with corruption, inefficiencies, and oh yeah, you have to be bloody rich to get any good out of it. The message that it delivers is that if you are rich, you are worth more as a human being than someone who makes less.

    Ugh.

    ReplyDelete
  14. hey Lil one! You are right that the administrative procedures for nurses and docs can be too time-consuming.

    It's the same for my country, Singapore. There are many things that need to be re-reviewed, and perhaps changed. Especially when it comes to healthcare because ppl don't always know how to be healthy.

    Did you read about the news "Richest woman was not given proper and correct treatment"? She's Oprah Winfrey and they reported the news in NaturalNews.com

    Take care - I look forward to reading more of your thoughts!

    ReplyDelete
  15. My parents had insurance through BCBS of Wisconsin when I was younger, and had trouble with them not paying for things they should have paid for for all of us (Mom, Dad, 3 kids). For awhile, they had BCBS of Alabama (part of Dad's pension from his first retirement) and they had trouble with that as well, mostly with Mom as she had two insurance policies (the other from her own job as a nurse). Now they're on Medicare as well as Dad's pension insurance, which I think is now something different, but has its own screw points (for example, Mom can only get so much in drug benefit per year before they cut her off--it cut her off at six months), so they're happy to have Medicare, too. Dad has a congenital heart defect and both my parents are diabetic, so I thank heaven they have insurance at all, but insurance is one big scam despite its benefits.

    ReplyDelete
  16. You'll get no argument from me regarding insurance being a scam and I am IN the field of insurance. I'm sorry your parents have to go through that. Seems like people can't even retire anymore because their lives become one long series of dealing with administration of one kind or another.

    ReplyDelete